1. Alaska

State v. Bromley, 987 P.2d 183 (Alaska, 1999)

Connecticut

Freeman v. Freeman, FA 0071977S, 200 Conn. Super. LEXIS 2040 (August 4, 2000)

Fortney v. Fortney, No. FA 980116310S, 1998 Conn. Super. LEXIS 3786 (Conn. Super. Ct. Dec. 3, 1998)

Murphy v. Murphy, No. FA 970156433S, 1998 Conn. Super. LEXIS 1343 (Conn. Super. Ct. May 11, 1998)

Hawaii

DeMello v. DeMello, 87 Haw. 209, 953 P.2d 968 (Haw. Ct. App. 1998)

Indiana

Brickner v. Brickner, 723 N.E.2d 468 (Ind. Ct. App. 2000)

Louisiana

State v. Frisard, 694 So. 2d 1032 (La. Ct. App. 1997)

Maine

Department of Human Serv. v. Frye, 2000 Me. 128, 754 A.2d 1000 (Me. 2000)

Department of Human Serv. ex rel. Young v. Leifester, 721 A.2d 189 (Me. 1998)

Nicholson v. Nicholson, 747 A.2d 588 (Me. 2000)

Minnesota

Jones v. Jones, No. C3-98-593, 1998 Minn. App. LEXIS 891 (Minn. Ct. App. Aug. 4, 1998)

Nebraska

Willers v. Willers, 587 N.W.2d 390 (Neb. 1998)

Groseth v. Groseth, 257 Neb. 525 (Neb. 1999)

New York

Saxton v. Saxton, 699 N.Y.S.2d 537 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)

North Carolina

Welsher v. Rager, 491 S.E. 2d 661 (N.C. Ct. App. 1997)

Tepper v. Hoch, No. COA99-1209, 2000 N. C. App. LEXIS 1152 (N.C. Ct. App. October 17, 2000)

Ohio

Vancott-Young v. Cummings, No. CA98-09-122, 1999 WL 326149, 1999 Ohio App. LEXIS 2342 (Ohio Ct. App. May 24, 1999)

Oregon

Cooney v. Cooney, 946 P.2d 305 (Or. Ct. App. 1997)

Texas

Attorney General v. Litten, 999 S.W.2d 74 (Tex. Ct. App. 1999)

Vermont

Cavallari v. Martin, 732 A.2d 739 (Vt. 1999)

Virginia

Burkholder v. Burkholder, No. 2767 -99-2, 200 Va. App. LEXIS 505 (Va. Ct. App. July 11, 2000)

Parks v. Parks, No. 1892-97-4, 1998 Va. App. LEXIS 85 (Va. Ct. App. Feb. 10, 1998)

Sheppard v. Sheppard, No. 0571-95-2, 1996 Va. App. LEXIS 261 (Va. Ct. App. Apr. 9, 1996)

Wine v. Brunty, 38 Va. Cir. 349, No.95-128 1996 Va. Cir. LEXIS 76 (Cir. Ct. Warren County, Feb. 6, 1996)

Washington

In re Peck, 82 Wash. App. 809, 920 P.2d 236 (Wash. Ct. App. 1996)

Arkansas

King v. State, 952 S.W.2d 180 (Ark. Ct. App. 1997)

Connecticut

Freeman v. Freeman, FA 0071977S, 200 Conn. Super. LEXIS 2040 (August 4, 2000)

North Carolina

State v. Bray, 130 N.C. App. 552, 503 S.E.2d 686 (N.C. Ct. App. 1998).

Texas

Attorney General v. Litten, 999 S.W.2d 74 (Tex. Ct. App. 1999)

Utah

State ex rel. Kirby v. Jacoby, 975 P.2d 939 (Utah Ct. App. 1999)

Virginia

Fitzhugh v. Dupre, No. 1388-97-1, 1997 Va. App. LEXIS 694 (Va. Ct. App. Nov. 10, 1997)

Arkansas

Office of Child Support Enforcement v. Clemmons, 984 S.W.2d 837 (Ark. Ct. App. 1999)

Connecticut

Bork v. Bork, No. FA 99175190S, 200 Conn. Super. LEXIS 832, (Conn. Super. Ct. Mar. 27, 2000)

Harvey v. Wilcox, No. FA 99011856, 2000 Conn. Super. LEXIS 1121 (Conn. Super. Ct. May 1, 2000), reargument denied, 2000 Conn. Super. LEXIS 1742 (Conn. Super. Ct. July 6, 2000)

Florida

Department of Revenue ex rel. Rochel v. Morris, 736 So.2d 41 (Fla. Ct. App. 1999) (failure to allow visitation is not a valid reason to deny enforcement of the child support order.)

New York

Barros v. Vila, 705 N.Y.S. 2d (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)

North Carolina

State v. Bray, 130 N.C. App. 552, 503 S.E.2d 686 (N.C. Ct. App. 1998)

Tepper v. Hoch, No. COA99-1209, 2000 N. C. App. LEXIS 1152 (N.C. Ct. App. October 17, 2000)

Ohio

Compton v. Compton, No. 99-CA-17, 1999 Ohio App. LEXIS 2592 (Ohio Ct. App. June 11, 1999)

Oregon

State ex rel California v. Ramirez, 167 Ore. App. 199, 2 P.3d 437 (Or. Ct. App. 2000)

Texas

Cowan v. Moreno, 903 S.W.2d 119 (Tex. Ct. App. 1995) (defense to registration and enforcement of a foreign support order based on lack of visitation was rejected.)

Villanueva v. Office of the Att'y Gen. of Tex., 935 S.W.2d 953 (Tex. Ct. App. 1996)

Colorado

People ex rel. Orange County Cal. ex rel. T.M.S. v. M.A.S., 962 P.2d 339 (Colo. Ct. App. 1998)

Florida

Schwier & State Dep't of Revenue v. Bernstein, 734 So.2d 531 (Fla. Ct. App. 1999)

Ohio

State v. Christenson, No. 99CAA12066, 2000 Ohio App. LEXIS 3458 (Ohio Ct. App. 5^th Dist., July 28, 2000)

Texas

Mathis v. State, 930 S.W.2d 203 (Tex. Ct. App. 1996)

Louisiana

State v. Hanson, 725 So.2d 514 (La. Ct. App. 1998)

North Carolina

Reid v. Dixon, 136 N.C. App. 438, 524 S.E.2d 576 (N.C. Ct. 2000)

South Carolina

Beyer v. Metze, 482 S.E.2d 789 (S.C. Ct. App. 1997)

Alaska

Child Support Enforcement Division v. Bromley, 987 P.2d 183 (Alaska, 1999) (the defense that a duty of support is not owed is not cognizable under UIFSA)

Delaware

Mason v. Berkheimer, Nos. CN-96-7215, 96-30010, 1997 WL 911242 (De. Fam. Ct. Nov. 4, 1997)

Colorado

State ex rel. Wyoming v. Stout, 969 P.2d 819 (Colo. Ct. App. 1998).

Maine

Hawley v. Murphy, 736 A.2d 268 (Maine, 1999)

Minnesota

Jones v. Jones, No. C3-98-593, 1998 Minn. App. LEXIS 891 (Minn. Ct. App. Aug. 4, 1998)

Mississippi

Carr. v. Carr, 724 So.2d 937 (Miss. Ct. App. 1998)

Missouri

Phillips v. Fallen, 6 S.W.3d 862 (Mo. 1999)

Nebraska

Harvey v. Harvey, 575 N.W.2d 167 (Neb. Ct. App. 1998)

Pennsylvania

Barr v. Barr, 2000 Pa. Super. 99, 749 A.2d 992 (Pa. Super. 2000)

South Carolina

South Carolina Dep't of Social Serv. v. Bess, 489 S.E.2d 671 (S. C. Ct. App. 1997)

South Dakota

State ex rel Freeman v. Sadlier, 586 N.W.2d 171 (S.D. 1998)

Washington

State v. Markovich, 100 Wn. App. 1017), 2000 Wash. App. LEXIS 548 (Wash. Ct. App. Apr. 3, 2000)

Arkansas

California v. West, 964 S.W.2d 221 (Ark. Ct. App. 1998)

Illinois

Hartman v. Hartman, 712 N.E.2d 367 (Ill. App. Ct. 1999)

Louisiana

State ex rel. Rivera v. Robles, 702 So.2d 1107 (La. Ct. App. 1997)

Arkansas

Davis v. Child Support Enforcement Unit, 933 S.W.2d 798 (Ark. 1996) (party not denied constitutional right of confrontation relating to allowing a party or witness residing in another state to testify by telephone, audiovisual means where the party made no effort to confront witnesses using this provision.

Washington v. Thompson, 6 S.W.3d 82 (Ark. 1999)

Colorado

People ex rel Orange County Cal. ex rel. T.M.S. v. M.A.S., 962 P.2d 339 (Colo. Ct. App. 1998)

Louisiana

State ex rel T.L.R. v. R.W.T., 737 So.2d 688 (La. 1999)

New York

Matter of Judith S., 183 Misc.2d 468, 701 N.Y.S.2d 880 (N.Y. Fam. Ct. 1999)

Pennsylvania

Cairns v. Cairns, 741 A.2d 800 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1999)

Washington

State ex rel. A.N.C. v. Grenley, 959 P.2d 1130 (Wash. Ct. App. 1998)

West Virginia

Stout v. Stout, 534 S.E. 2d 776 (W. Va. 2000)

Nebraska

Tomlin v. Tomlin, No. A-93-253, 1994 WL 697810, 1994 Neb. App. LEXIS 351 (Neb. Ct. App. 1994)

Oklahoma

Perdomo v. Fuller, 974 P.2d 185 (Okla. Civ. App. 1998)

Virginia

Roche v. Roche, 45 Va. Cir. 525, (Va. Cir. Ct. 1998)

Arkansas

Bonwich v. King, No. CA99-904, 2000 Ark. App. LEXIS 448 (Ark. Ct. App. May 31, 2000)

Nebraska

Allen v. Allen, No, A-95-1047, 1996 Neb. App. LEXIS 34 (Neb. Ct. App. Sept. 2, 1996)

New York

Neville v. Perry, 648 N.Y.S.2d 508 (N.Y. Fam. Ct. 1996)

Texas

In re Chapman, 973 S.W.2d 346 (Tex. Ct. App. 1998)

Virginia

Slawski v. Dep't of Social Services, 514 S.E.2d 773 (Va. Ct. App. 1999)

Arkansas

Jefferson County Child Support Enforcement Unit v. Ch. Ct. Vollie Hollands, Jr. 327 Ark. 456, 939 S.W.2d 302 (Ark. 1997)

Massachusetts

Peddar v. Peddar, 43 Mass. App. Ct. 192, 683 N.E.2d (1997)

California

D'Arcy v. Newman, 80 Cal. App. 4^th 846, 95 Cal. Reptr.2d 691 (Cal. Ct. App. 2000)

Colorado

In re Haddad, Colo. Ct. App., No. 03CA0072 (5/6/04):  The Colorado trial court erred in holding that it lacked jurisdiction to enter a judgment against the mother for overpaid child support due to a Colorado order granting retroactive support.  While the trial court stated it lacked jurisdiction, the appellate court pointed out that a support order under the UIFSA is defined as including an order for "reimbursement."  The opinion stated that the overpayment should be credited against his future support obligation only if "the interest of the children would not be harmed." 

Minnesota

Jones v. Jones, No. C3-98-593, 1998 Minn. App. LEXIS 891 (Minn. Ct. App., Aug. 4, 1998)

Missouri

Phillips v. Fallen, 6 S.W.3d 862 (Mo. 1999)

New York

Gloria P. v. Armondo P. No. QDS: 04700591, N.Y.L.J. Dec. 22, 1998 (N.Y. Fam. Ct. 1998)

In the Matter of Regina H. v. Joseph A.C., 184 Misc. 2d 978, 712 N.Y.S. 2d 347 (N.Y.Fam.Ct 2000)

Oklahoma

Perdomo v. Fuller, 974 P.2d 185 (Okla. Civ. App. 1998)

Washington

In re Peck, 82 Wash. App. 809, 920 P.2d 236 (Wash. Ct. App. 1996)

Colorado

In re Zinke, 967 P.2d 210 (Colo. Ct. App. 1998)

Connecticut

Clemens v. Clemens, Nos. FA 9901770802, FA 9901722125, 1999 Conn. Super. LEXIS 2856 (Conn. Super. Ct. Oct. 22, 1999)

Hawaii

DeMello v. DeMello, 87 Haw. 209, 953 P.2d 968 (Haw. Ct. App. 1998)

Idaho

Department of Health and Welfare v. Conley, 971 P.2d 332 (Idaho Ct. App. 1999)

Louisiana

Bordelon v. Dehnert, 99 2625 La. App. 1 Cir., 2000 La. App. LEXIS 2584 (La. Ct. App. September 22, 2000)

Jurado v. Brashear, 764 So.2d 1066 (La. Ct. App. 1^st Cir. 2000), writ of error granted 765 So.2d 345 (La 2000)

Massachusetts

Windsor v. Windsor, 45 Mass. App. Ct. 650, 700 N.E.2d 838 (Mass. App. Ct. 1998)

Minnesota

Abu-Dalbough v. Abu-Dalbough, 547 N.W.2d 700 (Minn. Ct. App. 1996)

Lustig v. Lustig, No. C4-96-940, 1996 Minn. App. LEXIS 1335 (Minn. Ct. App. Nov. 26, 1996)

Mississippi

McCubbin v. Seay, 749 So.2d 1127 (Miss. Ct. App. 1999)

Nebraska

Harvey v. Harvey, 575 N.W.2d 167 (Neb. Ct. App. 1998)

New York

In re Chisolm-Brownlee v. Chisholm, 177 Misc. 2d 185, 676 N.Y.S.2d 818 (N.Y. Fam. Ct. 1998)

Oklahoma

Grant v. Grant, 964 P.2d 963 (Okla. Ct. App. 1998)

Virginia

Franklin v. Commonwealth ex rel. Franklin, 497 S.E.2d 881 (Va. Ct. App. 1998)

Schreiber v. Schreiber, No.148669, 1997 Va. Cir. LEXIS 372, 43 Va. Cir. 274 (Cir. Ct. Fairfax Cty. Sept. 3, 1998)

Wisconsin

In re Carlin L.S. 593 N.W.2d 486 (Wis. Ct. App. 1999)

Wyoming

Washington ex rel. Mahoney v. St. John, 964 P.2d 1242 (Wyo. 1998)

Colorado

State ex rel. R.L.H., 942 P.2d 1386 (Colo. Ct. App. 1997)

Florida

State v. Hickman, 744 So.2d 1161 (Fla. Ct. App. 1999)

Louisiana

Bordelon v. Dehnert, 99 2625 La. App. 1 Cir., 2000 La. App. LEXIS 2584 (La. Ct. App. September 22, 2000)

Jurado v. Brashear, 764 So.2d 1066 (La. Ct. App. 1^st Cir. 2000), writ of error granted 765 So.2d 345 (La 2000)

Wyoming

Ostermiller v. Spurr, 968 P.2d 940 (Wyo. 1998)

Connecticut

Freeman v. Freeman, FA 0071977S, 200 Conn. Super. LEXIS 2040 (August 4, 2000)

Delaware

Linn v. State Child Support Enforcement and Toman, 736 A.2d 954 (Del. 1999)  [UIFSA § 205(a)(2) regarding written consents applies only in cases where one party remains in the issuing state]

Mason v. Berkheimer, Nos. CN-96-7215, 96-30010, 1997 WL 911242 (De. Fam. Ct. Nov. 4, 1997)

Northrup v. Northrup, Nos. CN95-07958, 96-08952, 96-22687, 1996 WL 862379 (Del. Fam. Ct. Nov. 8, 1996)

District of Columbia

Desai v. Desai Fore, 711 A.2d 822 (D.C. 1998)

Florida

Urso v. Urso, 724 So.2d 1253 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)

Massachusetts

Mannor v. Mannor, 703 N.E.2d 716 (Mass. Ct. App. 1998)

Mississippi

Carr v.Carr, 724 So.2d 937 (Miss. Ct. App. 1998).

Grumme v. Gumme, 5/7/04 (Miss. Ct. App. 2004): The trial court erred in ruling that the Mississippi court lacked jurisdiction under UIFSA to register, enforce and modify a Guam support decree where the ex-husband was a service-member who resided in Mississippi.  The divorce decree provided that jurisdiction over future issues would be in the country where the mother and child resided and the mother had moved to England.  The appellate court held that the trial court mistakenly applied a Mississippi case decided under the UCCJA.

Missouri

Phillips v. Fallen, 6 S.W.2d 862 (Mo. 1999)

Nevada

Office of Washoe County District Attorney v. Second Judicial District Court, 116 Nev. Adv. Op. No. 13, 5 P. 3d 562 (Nev. 2000)

North Carolina

Martin County o/b/o Hampton v. Dallas, NO. COA99-1186, 2000 N.C. App. 1113 (N.C. Ct. App. October 3, 2000)

Tepper v. Hoch, No. COA99-1209, 2000 N. C. App. LEXIS 1152 (N.C. Ct. App. October 17, 2000)

Oregon

State ex rel Leo v. Tuthill, 170 Ore. App. 2000 App. LEXIS 1648 (Or. Ct. App. September 27, 2000)

Texas

In the Interest of Nichols, No. 04-99-00926-CV, 2000 Tex. App. LEXIS 6990 (Tx. Ct. App. 4^th Dist. October 18, 2000)

Virginia

Burkholder v. Burkholder, No. 2767 -99-2, 200 Va. App. LEXIS 505 (Va. Ct. App. July 11, 2000) (spousal support)

Commonwealth ex rel. Kenitzer v. Richter, 475 S.E.2d 817 (Va. 1996)

Alaska

Alaska Dep't. of Revenue, Child Support Enforcement Div. ex rel. Wallace v. Delaney, 24 Fam. L. Rptr. 1514, 962 P.2d 187 (Alaska 1998)

McCafferty v. Green, 931 P.2d 407 (Alaska 1997)

Arkansas

Fox v. Fox, No. CA 99-410, 1999 Ark. App. LEXIS 821 (Ark. Ct. App. Dec. 15, 1999)

Jefferson County Child Support Enforcement Unit v. Ch. Ct. Vollie Hollands, Jr. 327 Ark. 456, 938 S.W.2d 302 (Ark. 1997)

Office of Child Support Enforcement v. Cook, 60 Ark. App. 193, 959 S.W.2d 763 (Ark. Ct. App. 1998)

Office of Child Support Enforcement v. Troxel, 931 S.W.2d 784 (Ark. 1996)

Pulaski County Child Support Enforcement Unit v. Norem, Jr., 328 Ark.546, 944 S.W.2d 846 (Ark. 1997)

Colorado

In re Zinke, 967 P.2d 210 (Colo. Ct. App. 1998)

Connecticut

Parry v. Bellinson, No. FA 980163453, 1998 Conn. Super. LEXIS 2830 (Conn. Super. Ct. October 3, 1998)

Delaware

Taylor v. Taylor, 672 A. 2d 44 (Del. 1996)

Florida

Lawlor v. Rasmussen, 745 So.2d 561 (Fla. Ct. App. 1999)

Urso v. Urso, 724 So.2d 1253 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)

Department of Revenue v. Cascella, 751 So.2d 1273 (Fla. Ct. App. 2000)

Hawaii

DeMello v. DeMello, 87 Haw. 209, 953 P.2d 968 (Haw. Ct. App. 1998)

Indiana

Hoehn v. Hoehn, 716 N.E.2d 479 (Ind. Ct. App. 1999)

Kansas

In re Marriage of Abplanalp, 7 P. 3d 1269, 200 Kan. App. LEXIS 762 (Ks. Ct. App. July 28, 2000

Gentzel v. Williams, 965 P.2d 855 (Kan Ct. App. 1998)

Kentucky

Cook v. Commonwealth, No. 1998-CA-002347-MR, 2000 Ky. App. LEXIS 19 (Ky. Ct. App. Feb. 18, 2000)

Louisiana

Jurado v. Brashear, 764 So.2d 1066 (La. Ct. App. 1^st Cir. 2000), writ of error granted 765 So.2d 345 (La 2000)

Maine

Nicholson v. Nicholson, 747 A.2d 588 (Me. 2000)

Maryland

Holbrook v. Cummings, 132 Md. App. 60, 750 A.2d 724 (Md. Ct. Spec. 2000)

Minnesota

Jones v. Jones, No. C3-98-593, 1998 Minn. App. LEXIS 891 (Minn. Ct. App., Aug. 4, 1998)

Kasdan v. Berney, 587 N.W.2d 319 (Minn. Ct. App. 1999)

Jackson v. Meeks, No. C3-97-1877, 1998 Minn. App. LEXIS 616 (Minn. Ct. App. May 26, 1998)

Mississippi

Peters v. Peters, 744 So.2d 803 (Miss. Ct. App. 1999).

Grumme v. Gumme, 5/7/04 (Miss. Ct. App. 2004): The trial court erred in ruling that the Mississippi court lacked jurisdiction under UIFSA to register, enforce and modify a Guam support decree where the ex-husband was a service-member who resided in Mississippi.  The divorce decree provided that jurisdiction over future issues would be in the country where the mother and child resided and the mother had moved to England.  The appellate court held that the trial court mistakenly applied a Mississippi case decided under the UCCJA.

Missouri

Phillips v. Fallen, 6. S.W.2d 862 (Mo. 1999)

State ex rel. Havlin v. Jamison, 971 S.W.2d 938 (Mo. Ct. App. 1998)

Nebraska

Tomlin v. Tomlin, No. A-93-253, 1994 WL 697810, 1994 Neb. App. LEXIS 351 (Neb. Ct. App. 1994)

Groseth v. Groseth, 257 Neb. 525 (Neb. 1999)

New Jersey

Youssefi v. Youssefi, 328 N.J. Super. 12, 744 A. 2d 662 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 2000)

Peace v. Peace, 325 N.J. Super. 122, 737 A.2d 1164 (N.J. Super. Ch. Div. 1999)

New York

In re Chisolm-Brownlee v. Chisholm, 177 Misc. 2d 185, 676 N.Y.S.2d 818 (N.Y. Fam. Ct. 1998)

Jeanette D. v. Dennis C. No. QDS:88701842, N.Y.L.J. Dec. 3, 1999 (N.Y. Fam. Ct. 1999)

Matter of Horovitz, No. QDS:28701578, N.Y.L.J. Sept. 24, 1999 (N.Y. Fam. Ct. 1999)

Matter of Jolanka K. No. QDS:58700808, N.Y.L.J. Feb. 26, 1999 (N.Y. Fam. Ct. 1999)

Reis v. Zimmer, 270 A.D. 2d 968, 710 N.Y.S. 2d 259 (N.Y. App. Div. 4^th Dep't. 2000)

Saxton v. Saxton, 699 N.Y.S.2d 537 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)

New Mexico

Rosen v. Lantis, 938 P.2d 729 (N.M. Ct. App. 1997)

North Carolina

Hinton v. Hinton, 496 S.E.2d 409 (N.C. Ct. App. 1998)

Twaddell v. Anderson, No. COA99-90, 1999 N.C. App. LEXIS 1306 (N.C. Ct. App. Dec. 21, 1999)

Ohio

Compton v. Compton, No. 99-CA-17, 1999 Ohio App. LEXIS 2592 (Ohio Ct. App. June 11, 1999)

Dunn v. Dunn, No. CA99-09-103, 2000 Ohio App. LEXIS 1262 (Ohio Ct. App. Mar. 27, 2000)

Oregon

State ex rel Leo v. Tuthill, 170 Ore. App. 2000 App. LEXIS 1648 (Or. Ct. App. September 27, 2000)

Pennsylvania

Clark v. Clark, 714 A.2d 427 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1998)

Hibbits v. Hibbits, 749 A.2d 975 (Pa. Super. Ct. 2000)

Reichenbacher v. Reichenbacher, 729 A.2d 97 (Pa. Super Ct. 1999)

South Carolina

Badeaux v. Davis, 552 S.E.2d 835 (S.C. Ct. App. 1999)

South Dakota

State ex rel. Freeman v. Sadlier, 586 N.W.2d 171 (S.D. 1998)

Weekley v. Weekley, 604 N.W.2d 19 (S.D. 1999)

Tennessee

Letellier v. Letellier, LeTellier v. LeTellier, 40 S.W. 3d 490 (Tenn. 2001)

Texas

In re Henderson, 982 S.W.2d 566 (Tex. Ct. App. 1998)

Link v. Alvarado, 929 S.W.2d 674 (Tex. 1996)

Thompson v. Thompson, 893 S.W.2d 301 (Tex. Ct. App. 1995)

Utah

State ex rel. Kirby v. Jacoby, 975 P.2d 939 (Utah Ct. App. 1999)

Vermont

Cavallari v. Martin, 732 A.2d 739 (Vt. 1999)

Virginia

Karimi v. Karimi, No. 1416-97-3, 1998 Va. App. LEXIS 349 (Va. Ct. App. June 16, 1998)

Washington

In re Erickson, 991 P.2d 123 (Wash. Ct. App. 2000)

West Virginia

Stout v. Stout, 534 S.E. 2d 776 (W. Va. 2000)

Wisconsin

Cepukenas v.Cepukenas, 584 N.W.2d 227 (Wis. Ct. App. 1998)

Oimoen v. Oimoen, 581 N.W.2d 594 (Wis. Ct. App. 1998)

Connecticut

Crowe v. Cerrone, No. FA 890030447, 2000 Conn. Super. LEXIS 1554 (Conn. Super. Ct. June 14, 2000)

Delaware

Department of Child Support Enforcement & Salzman v. Salzman, Nos. CN91-8814, CPI 98-27326, 1999 Del. Fam. Ct. LEXIS 38 (Del. Fam. Ct. 1999)

Florida

Department of Revenue ex rel. Sloan v. Sloan, 743 So.2d 11131 (Fla. Ct. App. 1999)

Department of Revenue v. Cascella, 751 So.2d 1273 (Fla. Ct. App. 2000)

New Jersey

Youssefi v. Youssefi, 328 N.J. Super. 12, 744 A. 2d 662 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 2000)

New York

Rose Marie W. v. Floyd J., 707 N.Y.S.2d 805 (N.Y. Fam. Ct. 2000)

Colorado

In re Haddad, Colo. Ct. App., No. 03CA0072 (5/6/04):  The Colorado trial court erred in holding that it lacked jurisdiction to enter a judgment against the mother for overpaid child support due to a Colorado order granting retroactive support.  While the trial court stated it lacked jurisdiction, the appellate court pointed out that a support order under the UIFSA is defined as including an order for "reimbursement."  The opinion stated that the overpayment should be credited against his future support obligation only if "the interest of the children would not be harmed." 

New York

Matter of Judith S., N.Y.L.J. Jan. 21, 2000 (N.Y. Fam. Ct. 2000)

Texas

In the Interest of Nichols, No. 04-99-00926-CV, 2000 Tex. App. LEXIS 6990 (Tx. Ct. App. 4^th Dist. October 18, 2000)

Virginia

Commonwealth v. Sweat, No. CR96-277, 41 Va. Cir. 104, 1996 Va. Cir. LEXIS 456 (Cir Ct. Spotsylvania Cty. Oct. 15, 1996)

Texas

Office of the Attorney Gen. v. Carter, 977 S.W.2d 159 (Tex. Ct. App. 1998)

Connecticut

State ex rel. Filipov v. Filipov, 2000 Conn. Super. LEXIS 266 (Conn. Super. Ct. Jan. 31, 2000)

Pennsylvania

Barr v. Barr, 2000 Pa. Super. 99, 749 A.2d 992 (Pa. Super. 2000)

Delaware

Linn v. State Child Support Enforcement and Toman, 736 A.2d 954 (Del. 1999)

Florida

Department of Human Resources v. Deason, 138 Ga. App. 853, 520 S.E.2d 712 (Ga. Ct. App. 1999)

Louisiana

State v. Shaddinger, 702 So.2d 965 (La. Ct. App. 1997)

Massachusetts

Child Support Enforcement Div. of Alaska v. Brenckle, 424 Mass. 214, 675 N.E.2d 390 (Ma. 1997)

Minnesota

Dean v. MacMaster, No. CX-97-631, 1997 Minn. App. LEXIS 1115, (Minn. Ct. App. October 7, 1997)

Nebraska

Van Horn v. Van Horn, No. A-94-282, 1995 Neb. App. LEXIS 313 (Neb. Ct. App. Oct. 10, 1995)

State ex rel. Clanton v. Clanton, 1996 W L 456037, 1996 Neb. App. LEXIS 198 (Neb. Ct. App. 1996)

Ohio

Dunn v. Dunn, No. CA99-09-103, 2000 Ohio App. LEXIS 1262 (Ohio Ct. App. Mar. 27, 2000)

Oklahoma

Department of Human Services ex rel. Pavlovich v. Pavlovich, 932 P.2d 1080 (Okla. 1996)

Oregon

State ex rel Leo v. Tuthill, 170 Ore. App. 2000 App. LEXIS 1648 (Or. Ct. App. September 27, 2000)

South Carolina

Deltoro v. McMullen, 471 S.E. 2d 742 (S.C. Ct. App. 1996)

Texas

Cowan v. Moreno, 903 S.W. 2d 119 (Tex. Ct. App. 1995)

Neal v. Office of the Att'y Gen. No. 05-95-01258 -CV, 1997 Tex. App. Lexis 1381 (Mar. 19, 1997)

Utah

State ex rel Kirby v. Jacoby, 975 P.2d 939 (Utah Ct. App. 1999)

Vermont

Cavallari v. Martin, 732 A.2d 739 (Vt. 1999)

Virgin Islands

Virgin Islands (Government) ex rel. Simanca v. Proctor, 39 V.I.28, No. S3/1998, 1998 WL453666, 1998 V.I. LEXIS 13 (V.I. July 10, 1998)

Washington

State ex rel. A.N.C. v. Grenley, 959 P.2d 1130 (Wash. Ct. App. 1998)

Wisconsin

Hubanks v. Hubanks, 555 N.W.2d 647 (Wis. Ct. App. 1996)

Arkansas

State v. Terry, 985 S.W.2d 711 (Ark. 1999)

Idaho

Selkirk Seed v. Forney, 996 P.2d 798 (Idaho 2000)

Illinois

Hartman v. Hartman, 712 N.E.2d 367 (Ill. App. Ct. 1999) (A child support enforcement petition by a child support enforcement agency, when the petition does not name the obligee as a party, does not create identity between the parties so as to trigger the doctrine or res judicata against a later child support enforcement petition by the obligee.)

Nevada

Office of Washoe County District Attorney v. Second Judicial District Court, 116 Nev. Adv. Op. No. 13, 5 P. 3d 562 (Nev. 2000)

Wyoming

Flores v. Flores, 979 P.2d 944 (Wyo. 1999)

Arkansas

Chaisson v. Ragsdale, 914 S.W. 2d 739 (Ark. 1996) (Issues such as visitation and payment of debts under the divorce decree are collateral matters and cannot be addressed under a UIFSA action.)

Colorado

State ex rel. R.L.H., 942 P.2d 1386 (Colo. Ct. App. 1997)

Kentucky

Cook v. Commonwealth, No. 1998-CA-002347-MR, 2000 Ky. App. LEXIS 19 (Ky. Ct. App. Feb. 18, 2000)

Louisiana

Stagg v. Stagg, 721 So.2d 1097 (La. Ct. App. 1998)

Maryland

Holbrook v. Cummings, 132 Md. App. 60, 750 A.2d 724 (Md. Ct. Spec. App. 2000)

New York

Anostario v. Anostario, 670 N.Y.S.2d 629 (N.Y. App. Div.1998)

Ohio

Longfellow v. Ezzell, No. 99-A-0001, 2000 Ohio App. LEXIS 784 (Ohio Ct. App. Mar. 3, 2000)

Texas

In re Henderson, 982 S.W.2d 566 (Tex. Ct. App. 1998)

Virginia

Commonwealth, Dep't of Social Services, Div. of Child Support Enforcement ex rel Gagne v. Chamberlain, 525 S.E.2d 19 (Va. Ct. App. 2000)

Commonwealth, Dep't of Social Services, Div. Of Child Support Enforcement, ex rel Bryant v. Carlton, No. 1387-99-1, 2000 Va. App. LEXIS 143 (Va. Ct. App. Feb. 29, 2000)

Washington

In re Peck, 82 Wash. App. 809, 920 P.2d 236 (Wash. Ct. App. 1996)

Illinois

IRMO Kohl, 334 Ill.App.3d 867, 778 N.E.2d 1169, 268 Ill.Dec. 547 (1st Dist., 2d Div., 2002) -- Non-registering party may contest validity or enforcement of registered order due to lack of personal jurisdiction.

Maine

Nicholson v. Nicholson, 747 A.2d 588 (Me. 2000)

Minnesota

Graves v. Elliot, C5-00-399, 2000 Minn. App. LEXIS 938 (Mn. Ct. App. August 29, 2000)

New York

Taukatch v. Taukatch, N.Y.L.J. Jan. 19, 1999 (N.Y. Fam. Ct. 1999)

Ohio

Poljakov v. Kshywonis, No. C.A. 19843, 2000 Ohio App. LEXIS 3094 (Ohio Ct. App. July 12, 2000)

Washington

Rains v. State, No. 17841-2-III, 1999 Wash. App. 2028 (Wash. Ct. App. Dec. 2, 1999)